Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/16976/2026 of BIOMAK LABORATORIES PVT LTD Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 28 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16976 of 2026 Date of Decision: 28.09.2026 _______________________________________________________________________ Biomak Laboratories Private Limited ……...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Others …....Respondents Coram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.16976 of 2026 Date of Decision: 28.09.2026 _______________________________________________________________________ Biomak Laboratories Private Limited
……...Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Others
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge Whether approved for reporting? __________________________________________________________________________
For the petitioner: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Sushant Keprate, Additional Advocate General, for respondents-State. __________________________________________________________________________
Ajay Mohan Goel, J. (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Sushant Keprate, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner primarily is against Annexure P- 9, which is a show cause notice dated 10th of August, 2026, on the subject 'Show cause notice for cancellation of registration', in terms whereof, as per the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, besides issuance of the show cause notice, the registration of the petitioner has also been suspended with effect from 10th of August, 2026.
3. The learned Senior Counsel has submitted that response to the same has been filed expeditiously and diligently by the petitioner, yet till date
-2- no decision has been taken on the basis of the reply, by the authority concerned.
4. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that needful will be done by the authority concerned within four weeks.
5. Having heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner as also learned Additional Advocate General, in our considered view, in the light of the fact that the date of the show cause notice is 10th of August, 2026 and response thereto was filed by the present petitioner as far back as on 2nd of September, 2026, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition with the direction that appropriate order in terms of the show cause notice and reply thereto, shall be passed by the authority concerned on or before 15th of October, 2026, and in case needful is not done by the authority by 15th of October, 2026, then the show cause notice shall be deemed to have been recalled. Ordered accordingly. However, it is clarified that we have not made any observation on the merits of the case.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel), Judge
(Yogesh Jaswal), Judge September 28, 2026 Rajeev Raturi