Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1060/2026 of BHARAT SINGH CHAUHAN Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 28 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1060 of 2026 Decided on: 28 th September, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Bharat Singh Chauhan ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:41770
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1060
of 2026
Decided on: 28
th September, 2026
___________________________________________________________________ Bharat Singh Chauhan ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Rajul Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General. . Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 26.09.2026, issued by Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1 and copy of office order dated 25.09.2026, passed by the Deputy Director School Education (Elementary), Shimla District, Shimla, H.P., which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the office order dated 25.09.2026 reveals that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and he has been allowed the benefits in terms of the judgment passed in CWP No.5390 of 2024, titled, Surya Prabha 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
and others vs. State of H.P. and others and the Block Elementary Education Officer Kotkhai has been directed to implement the above said judgment in letter and spirit. However, the same is subject to the final outcome of LPA No.62 of 2026 or any further remedy being exercised by the State regarding grant of promotional increment to the petitioners to the post of Head Teacher.
3. This Court while allowing the writ petition preferred by the petitioner has only given direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation made by the petitioner.
4. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 22.07.2025, passed in CWP No.4461 of 2025, titled, Bharat Singh Chauhan vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has duly been complied with and the necessary orders have been passed by the Deputy Director School Education (Elementary), Shimla, District Shimla (HP), nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case, the petitioner is not paid the consequential benefits strictly in terms of the judgment passed by this Court, which is sought to be executed, within a period of eight weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the present execution petition.
5. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
th September, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge