Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/565/2022 of M/S ADITYA INDUSTRIES Vs STATE OF HP AND ANR on 28 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.564 of 2022 a /w CWPs No.565 and 566 of 2022 Decided on: 28.09.2026 CWP No.564 of 2022 M/s Aditya Industries … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents CWP No.565 of 2022 M/s Aditya Industries … Petitioner
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2022:HHC:16649 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.564 of 2022 a/w CWPs No.565 and 566 of 2022 Decided on: 28.09.2026 CWP No.564 of 2022 M/s Aditya Industries … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents CWP No.565 of 2022 M/s Aditya Industries … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents CWP No.566 of 2022 M/s J.B. Rolling Mills Limited … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioners(s): M/s Ajay Vaidya and Surinder Saklani, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2, in all the petitions. Ms. Kiran Verma, Advocate, vice Mr.Rajinder
Singh Thakur, Central Government Counsel, for respondent No.3, in all the petitions. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that as there is a technical flaw in these petitions, the petitioners be allowed to withdraw the same, with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause.
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2022:HHC:16649
2. Be that as it may, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn,with liberty, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The petitions stand disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge (Yogesh Jaswal) Judge
September 28, 2026 (Rishi)