Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2261/2026 of MADAN MOHAN SHARMA Vs THE HPSEBL AND OTHERS on 25 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 2261 of 2026 Date of Decision: 25.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Madan Mohan Sharma …….Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited & others … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 2261 of 2026 Date of Decision: 25.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Madan Mohan Sharma
…….Petitioner
Versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited & others
… Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 16.03.2026, issued under the signatures of Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, Solan, Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, learned counsel representing the respondents, states that in terms of the mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, petitioner Madan Mohan Sharma has been paid sum of Rs. 10,97, 135/- as retirement gratuity and sum of Rs. 7,43,820/- on account of leave encashment. He states that as far as interest on delayed payment is concerned, same shall be paid expeditiously.
2. Having taken note of aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, vis-à-vis mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, this Court has reason to presume and believe that mandate contained in the judgment stands duly complied with and as 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is discoed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that interest on delayed payment, if any, is also released/ paid within a period of four weeks, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived, so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the attachment of the property of the department as well as salary of the erring official.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 25,2026 (shankar)