Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1765/2026 of PRADEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER on 25 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1765of 2026 Date of Decision: 25.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Pradeep Kumar and Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. …....Respondents Coram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.1765of 2026
Date of Decision: 25.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Pradeep Kumar and Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioners: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record communication dated 24.09.2026 issued under signature of Director (School Education), enclosing therewith communications dated 23.9.2026 addressed to Secretary (Education), Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in judgment sought to be executed has been complied with. He states that respondents, after having regularized the petitioners in the pay scale of Rs. 10300-34800 plus Rs. 3600 grade pay plus allowances from their initial appointment / joining date, have been granted arrears restricted to three years prior to the
2 petition's filing date. He states that first installment of Rs. 84,454/- and Rs. 87,160/- respectively, stand credited in the bank accounts of the petitioners. He states that remaining amount shall be paid expeditiously.
2. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant execution petition and same is disposed of accordingly with direction to the respondents to ensure that balance payment is paid to the petitioners expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months, failing which petitioners would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment.
September 25, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge