Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1498/2026 of KUSUM LATA Vs ASHISH KUMAR KOHLI on 25 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 1498/2026 Decided on: 25.09.2026 Kusum Lata …..Petitioner Versus Ashish Kumar Kohli ….Respondent ______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:41474 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 1498/2026
Decided on: 25.09.2026
Kusum Lata
…..Petitioner
Versus
Ashish Kumar Kohli
….Respondent ______________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Niranjana, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
The present petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of order, dated 21.05.2026, as passed by this Court in CWP No. 7246/2026.
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of order, dated 17.08.2026, as passed by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in batch of appeals, lead being LPA No.205/2025, titled as State of H.P. vs. Chunni Lal, whereby order, dated 21.03.2024, as passed in CWP No.
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
8148/2022, titled as Yashwant Kumar vs. State of H.P. on the basis of which petitioner is seeking parity, has been stayed.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has acknowledged the aforesaid fact and submitted that for the time being, the instant petition can be closed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application for revival of the instant petition in case, after decision of aforesaid LPA, her grievance still remains unaddressed. Ordered accordingly.
In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is closed, however with liberty as aforesaid. The petition stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma) 25.09.2026
Judge (pankaj)