Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMP-T/354/2026 of RAMESH KUMAR Vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER on 24 September 2026
KUMAR Versus STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER CMP-T-354 of 2026 24.09.2026 Present: Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State. While
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
RAMESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CMP-T-354 of 2026 24.09.2026 Present: Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State.
While placing on record communication dated 23.09.2026, issued under the signatures of Director Health Services, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with.
Having carefully perused aforesaid document, which is taken on record, viz-a-viz directions contained in the judgment sought to be executed, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. Application stands disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge
September 24, 2026
(Sunil)