Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.PT/114/2026 of CHANDER SEKHAR Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 24 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition(T) No.114 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Chander Sekhar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition(T) No.114 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Chander Sekhar
…….Petitioner
Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
… Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Having carefully perused compliance affidavit vis-a-vis mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed, this court is convinced and satisfied that direction contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands complied with and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file separate petition, if any, qua the surviving grievances. Needless to say, consequential benefits, i.e., seniority and promotion, if any, pursuant to judgment sought to be executed, if not released or done, shall also
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
be done expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from today.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 24, 2026 (sunil)