Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1719/2026 of RAM KRISHAN Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS on 24 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1719 of 2026 Decided on: 24.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Ram Krishan ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1719 of 2026 Decided on: 24.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Ram Krishan
...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Ms. Tim Saran Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 23.09.2026 issued by the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171001 and copy of office order dated 20.08.2026 passed by the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (HP), which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of aforesaid office order dated 20.08.2026 reveals that the petitioner has been granted the benefit of higher pay scale, subject to final outcome of LPA filed by the Department.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
dated 26.08.2025, passed in CWP No.13689 of 2025, titled, Ram Krishan vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today, in terms of the directions given by this Court in aforementioned judgment, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th September
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge