Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/16649/2026 of BEGU DEVI Vs THE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16649 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Begu Devi …….Petitioner Versus Bank of India & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

2026:HHC:41051 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No.16649 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Begu Devi

…….Petitioner

Versus

Bank of India & others

… Respondents _______________________________________________________

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1

For the Petitioner: Ms. Madhurika Sekhon, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. Virender Singh, Advocated, for respondent No.3.

____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):

Learned counsel representing the respondent-Bank fairly states that during the pendency of present petition, respondent No.3, Sh. Pardeep Verma, has deposited sum of Rs. 10 lakh with the respondent-Bank, as a consequence whereof, the public notice of auction, which was laid challenge in the instant proceedings, has been withdrawn and NOC stands granted in favour of respondent No.3. In the aforesaid background, learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same may be disposed of, reserving 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2 2026:HHC:41051 liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law against respondent No.3. Ordered accordingly.

(Sandeep Sharma),

Judge September 24, 2026 (shankar)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead