Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/16649/2026 of BEGU DEVI Vs THE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 24 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16649 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Begu Devi …….Petitioner Versus Bank of India & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:41051 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.16649 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Begu Devi
…….Petitioner
Versus
Bank of India & others
… Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Ms. Madhurika Sekhon, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Virender Singh, Advocated, for respondent No.3.
____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Learned counsel representing the respondent-Bank fairly states that during the pendency of present petition, respondent No.3, Sh. Pardeep Verma, has deposited sum of Rs. 10 lakh with the respondent-Bank, as a consequence whereof, the public notice of auction, which was laid challenge in the instant proceedings, has been withdrawn and NOC stands granted in favour of respondent No.3. In the aforesaid background, learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same may be disposed of, reserving 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:41051 liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law against respondent No.3. Ordered accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 24, 2026 (shankar)