Himachal Pradesh High Court

CRMP/3776/2025 of CHARNO RAM Vs STATE OF HP on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

State of H.P. Cr. Appeal (C-DB) No. 8 of 2025 24.09.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Tarun Mehta, Advocates, for the appellant. Mr. I.N. Mehta Senior Additional Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Cr.MP No.3776 of 2025 Learned counsel for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Charno Ram Vs. State of H.P. Cr. Appeal (C-DB) No. 8 of 2025 24.09.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Tarun Mehta, Advocates, for the appellant. Mr. I.N. Mehta Senior Additional Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Cr.MP No.3776 of 2025 Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant submits that there is a fair chance of acquittal in the present case on the ground that independent witnesses PW-3 Suresh Kumar and PW-14 Randhir Singh have been declared hostile and PW-1 HHC Rajinder Singh official witness has also been declared hostile and there is no proof of conscious possession of the applicant of the contraband alleged to be recovered from the applicant. On perusal of the statement of PW-1, it is apparent that he has been declared hostile on a short point, as he had stated that HC Ankush did not remain on the spot when rukka was brought to the Police Station and before declaring hostile, he was fully supported the prosecution case and even after declaring hostile, he has clarified and deposed in favour of the prosecution and in cross-examination by the defence counsel, nothing material could be elucidated against the case of the prosecution.

So far as statements of PW-3 Suresh Kumar and PW-14 Randhir Singh are concerned, on material particulars they have supported the prosecution case. They have admitted their presence along with motorcycle on the spot at relevant point of time as well as presence of the Police Party and also the applicant/appellant/accused. In the aforesaid facts, the mere fact that the independent witnesses were declared hostile and one police official was also declared hostile, cannot be a ground for fair chance of acquittal as there is sufficient evidence, which has been duly corroborated by the witnesses, including the witnesses who were declared hostile during the trial and therefore, prima facie, it cannot be said that there is a fair chance of acquittal of the accused. Recovery of 1.104 Kgs of Charas from possession of applicant has been duly corroborated by PW-1 HHC Rajinder Singh, PW-2 ASI Ghanshyam and PW-12 HC Ankush Pathania. Even PW-14 Randhir Singh has admitted that on weighing, Charas was found 1.104 Kgs, and proceeding carried out by Police on the spot were photographed and his statement Ex.P55/PW-14 was also recorded on the spot by the Police. PW-14 has also admitted his signatures on seizure memo and other documents. He has also identified the spot and proceedings in photographs. No other point has been urged. Accordingly, we do not find any merit in the application at this stage and the same is dismissed. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge 24th September, 2026 (Kiran) (Bhupesh Sharma) Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead