Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/13367/2025 of KESHVI CHAUHAN Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13367 of 2025 Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Keshvi Chauhan …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No.13367 of 2025 Date of Decision: 24.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Keshvi Chauhan

…….Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

… Respondents _______________________________________________________

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1

For the Petitioner: Mr. Anshul Attri, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent- State.

Mr. Kanwar Singh Kanwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):

While placing on record copy of communication dated 23.09.2026, issued under the signature of Director, Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that relief, prayed for in the instant petition, stands granted to the petitioner.

2. Having carefully perused the aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds that petitioner, Ms. Keshvi 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2

Chauhan has been admitted in Class-V of Parangat School of Excellence Kansiwala, Nahan, District Sirmaour, Himachal Pradesh, which fact has been acknowledged by learned counsel representing the petitioner.

3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.p

(Sandeep Sharma),

Judge September 24, 2026 (Sunil)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead