Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2200/2026 of PREM LAL Vs THE HRTC AND OTHERS on 24 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2200 of 2026 Date of Decision: 24.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Prem Lal ……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors. …....Respondents Coram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.2200 of 2026
Date of Decision: 24.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Prem Lal ……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record copy of order dated 01.09.2026 issued under the signature of Executive Director, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Mr. Vinod Gupta, learned counsel representing the respondents states that after considering factual matrix as well as relevant rules and judicial precedents, petitioner has been found entitled for grant of pension as well as retiral benefits as per CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 and CCS (Leave) Rules, 1972 and as such, direction has been issued to the Finance and Pension Branch of the Corporation to do the needful for release of actual benefits in favour of the petitioner.
2
2. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, instant petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits flowing from the aforesaid compliance order shall be released expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment. September 24, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge