Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2180/2026 of SARWAN KUMAR Vs CSKHPKV PALAMPUR on 23 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2180 of 2026 Date of Decision: 23.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sarwan Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.2180 of 2026
Date of Decision: 23.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sarwan Kumar
……...Petitioner Versus Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya
…....Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 8.5.2025, passed by coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3905 of 2025, titled Sarwan Kumar v. Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya and Anr., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to respondent/competent authority to consider and decide case of the petitioner in light of Surajmani and Sarwan Kumar, within a period of six weeks. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken
2 at the behest of the respondent pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of six weeks from today.
3. Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by learned counsel for the respondent, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment alleged to have been violated within a period of six weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment.
September 23, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge