Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1419/2026 of KUSHAL DUTT Vs RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS on 23 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1419 of 2026 Date of decision:23.09.2026 Kushal Dutt ...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & others ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Mamta Garg,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.1419 of 2026
Date of decision:23.09.2026
Kushal Dutt
...Petitioner
Versus Rakesh Kanwar & others
...Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
The instant petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 2162 of 2026, dated 03.03.2026.
2. When the matter was listed before this Court on 22.09.2026, the learned Additional Advocate General had sought time to have instructions in the matter.
3. Today, he has placed on record a copy of the office order dated 22.09.2026, whereby after considering the case of the petitioner, the same has been allowed and the DDO concerned has been directed to prepare the arrears as per the instructions of the Finance Department and as per the latest instructions issued by the Principal Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
Secretary (Finance) to the Govt. of H.P. It has further been stated in the aforesaid office order that the DDO concerned shall obtain an undertaking to this effect from the petitioner that the overpayment, if any, found at a later stage, shall be recovered from him accordingly.
4. Since the judgment stands fully complied with by the State, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition.
5. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 23rd September, 2026
(vt)