Himachal Pradesh High Court

EX.P./1526/2026 of JAGDISH KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1526 of 2026 Decided on: 23.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Jagdish Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus State of HP and others ...Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1526 of 2026 Decided on: 23.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Jagdish Kumar and others

...Petitioners Versus State of HP and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Ms. Kiran Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

, Judge

(Oral)

Learned vice counsel representing the petitioners submits that after the directions given by this Court in the judgment, which is sought to be executed, the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Mandi, Distt. Mandi (HP), has passed an office order dated 22.08.2026, which has been taken on record along with instructions, thereby extending the relief to the petitioners, but the consequential benefits of arrears have not been paid to them.

2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

22.08.2026 reveals that the petitioners have been allowed higher pay scale of Rs.40,100/- after two years of regular services, subject to final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830 of 2023, titled as Inder Singh and any other legal remedies. The DDOs concerned have been directed to fix the pay of the petitioners and release the arrears.

3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 14.10.2025, passed in CWP No.16027 of 2025, titled, Jagdish Kumar and Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioners, within eight weeks from today, in terms of the directions given by this Court in the aforementioned judgment, they shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.

4. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

rd September

, 2026

( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead