Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2167/2026 of MOHAN SINGH Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 23 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2167 of 2026 Date of Decision: 23.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Mohan Singh ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.2167 of 2026
Date of Decision: 23.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Mohan Singh ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents No. 1 to 4.
Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record communication dated 23.9.2026, issued under the signature of of Financial Advisor cum Chief Accounts Officer, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, states that in terms of mandate contained in judgment sought to be executed, PPO No. HRTC/NPS/20215 has been issued in favour of the petitioner, who retired on 31.03.2025 for arranging the payments.
2
2. Careful perusal of aforesaid document, which is taken on record, reveals that petitioner has already been sanctioned pension to the tune of Rs.24,424/- per month.
3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to ensure that arrears on account of pension, if not already released, are released expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months, failing which petitioner would be entitled to statutory interest.
September 23, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge