Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.PT/124/2026 of KISHOR KUMAR Vs HRTC AND ANOTHER on 22 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition (T) No. 124 of 2026 Date of Decision: 22.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Mr. Kishor Kumar …….Petitioner Versus HRTC & another … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:40598
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition (T) No. 124 of 2026 Date of Decision: 22.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Mr. Kishor Kumar
…….Petitioner
Versus
HRTC & another
… Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Shrutika, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication issued under signatures of Manager (Technical) HRTC Divisional Workshop, Tara Devi, Shimla, Ms. Shrutika, learned counsel representing the respondents, states that respondent-Corporation, after having calculated total arrears to the tune of Rs. 12,36,773, has already paid first installment of Rs. 2,67,997 vide cheque No. 212498, dated 28.10.2025. She states that second installment of Rs.2, 67,997/- has been also paid vide cheque No. 229637, dated 29.08.2026. She further states that remaining amount of Rs. 7,00,779/- shall also be paid in installments and same shall be cleared on or before March, 2028.
2. In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, same are closed with a direction to the respondent-Corporation to ensure that entire balance amount is 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2026:HHC:40598
paid to the petitioner on or before March, 2028, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived, so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the attachment of the property of the department as well as salary of the erring official.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 22,2026 (shankar)