Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./940/2026 of KESHAV SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 22 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.940 of 2026 Decided on: 22nd September, 2026 Keshav Kumar ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:40630
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No.940 of 2026
Decided on: 22nd September, 2026
Keshav Kumar
....Petitioner
versus
State of H.P. and others
...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Ms. Bheeshmlata, Advocate vice Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General has produced instructions dated 21.09.2026 issued by the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla- 171001 and copy of office order dated 04.07.2026 passed by the Deputy Director Elementary Education, Hamirpur. H.P. The same are taken on record.
2. A perusal of aforesaid office order reveals that the petitioner has been held entitled for higher pay scale of Rs.40,100/- after completion of two years regular service.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 26.11.2025 passed in CWP No.18291 of 2025, titled, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2026:HHC:40630 2
Keshav Kumar versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is closed. However, in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner within eight weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 22nd September, 2026
Judge (naveen)