Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2174/2026 of NAROTAK KUMAR Vs HRTC AND OTHERS on 21 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 2174 of 2026 Date of Decision: 21.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Narotak Kumar …….Petitioners Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Anr. … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 2174 of 2026 Date of Decision: 21.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Narotak Kumar
…….Petitioners
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Anr. … Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioners: Ms. Shivani, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 24.07.2026, issued under the signatures of the Divisional Manager, HRTC, Dharamshala, Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, learned counsel representing the respondents, states that a sum of Rs. 11,90,244/- on account of DCRG has been sanctioned in favour of the petitioner and, out of aforesaid amount, sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- has already been released vide cheque No.47101, dated 14.11.2025. He further states that sum of Rs.7, 21, 360/- on account of leave encashment shall also be released, subject to availability of funds, if any, by the government. Since sum of Rs. 11, 90,244/- stands sanctioned in favour of the petitioner on account of DCRG, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release remaining amount of Rs. 9,90,244/- on account of DCRG as well as sum of Rs.7, 21, 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 360/- on account of leave encashment in favour of the petitioner within a period of three months, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived, so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the attachment of the property of the department as well as salary of the erring official.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 21,2026 (shankar)