Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2161/2026 of RAKESH KUMAR Vs HRTC AND ANR on 21 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2161 of 2026 Date of Decision: 21.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Rakesh Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Anr. …....Respondents Coram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.2161 of 2026
Date of Decision: 21.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Rakesh Kumar
……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Anr. …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record communication dated 16.9.2026, issued under the signature of Regional Manager, HRTC, Dharamshala, learned counsel representing the respondents states that the DCRG amount amounting to Rs. 5,31,648/- has already been paid to the petitioner vide cheque No. 50969 dated 16.9.2026. He further states that amount, if any, payable on account of leave encashment along with admissible interest shall also be paid expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks.
2
2. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure payment of admissible interest within a period of six weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment.
September 21, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge