Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWPIL/136/2025 of RAHAM TULLAH Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 21 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 136 of 2025 Decided on:21.09.2026 ________________________________________________________ Court on its own motion. ……….. Appellant Versus State of HP & Ors. …..Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 136 of 2025 Decided on:21.09.2026 ________________________________________________________ Court on its own motion. ……….. Appellant Versus State of HP & Ors.
…..Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the petitioner : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh and Gobind Korla, Additional Advocates General, Ms. Priyanka Chauhan and Mr. Sidharath Jalta, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mr. Bharat Bushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.4.
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral)
While placing on record notification dated 18.09.2026, issued under the signatures of Chief Secretary (Revenue) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that relief, prayed for in the instant petition, stands granted to the petitioner.
2. Careful perusal of aforesaid document, which is taken on record, reveals that His Excellency the Governor, Himachal Pradesh, in
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
exercise of powers conferred under Section 12 of the Waf (Amendment) Act 2025 and Section 14 of the Principal Waqf Act, Act 1985, has been pleased to nominate 12 members from the Muslim community as members of the State Waqf Board.
3. Having carefully perused aforesaid communication vis-a- vis the relief prayed in the instant petition, we are convinced that relief prayed for therein stands granted to the petitioner and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings. Accordingly, the same are closed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of law qua surviving grievance, if any. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
(Bipin Chander Negi) Judge September 21, 2026 sunil