Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2162/2026 of JAGDISH CHAND Vs HRTC AND ANOTHER on 21 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2162 of 2026 Date of Decision: 21.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Jagdish Chand ……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors. …....Respondents Coram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.2162 of 2026
Date of Decision: 21.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Jagdish Chand
……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr.V.S. Kanwar, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record communication dated 21.9.2026, issued under the signature of Regional Manager, HRTC, Local Unit-II, Dhalli, Shimla-12, Himachal Pradesh, learned counsel for the petitioner states that mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with. Careful perusal of aforsiad communicaiton, which is taken on record reveals that sums of Rs. 5,03,958/- and Rs. 3,25,634/- stand paid to the petitioner on account of DCRG and leave encashment vide Cheque No. 051175 dated 18.09.2026.
2
2. Learned counsel representing the respondents fairly states that interest on delayed payment shall also be calculated and disbursed expeditiously.
3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure payment of admissible interest within a period of two months, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment.
September 21, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge