Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/7002/2024 of VIKAS AGGARWAL Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7002 of 2024 Date of Decision: 25.6.2025 Vikas Aggarwal ...Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer & Ors.. ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7002 of 2024 Date of Decision: 25.6.2025 Vikas Aggarwal ...Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer & Ors..

...Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ashwani K. Lal and Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Neeraj Sharma and Mr. Ishaan Kashyap, Advocates Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)

The instant petition has been filed for grant of the following substantive relief:- “(a) That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, thereby quashing/setting aside the impugned notice under Section 148 dated 29.03.2024 (Annexure P-2) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. ( 2025:HHC:19881 ) being illegal, without jurisdiction, against the procedure and further based on the illegal sanction/approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and all proceedings/actions consequent thereto.”

2. The subject matter of the challenge in this petition, whereby the legality, validity and propriety of impugned notice under Section 148, dated 29.03.2024 (Annexure P-2) is already under consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in SLP (c) Diary No. 17041/2024., case titled Union of India & Ors. Vs. Association of Technical Textiles Manufacturers and Processors & Anr.

3. Since the issue involved in this petition is already pending consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, therefore, keeping in view the judicial discipline, we refrain ourselves from giving our opinion with respect to impugned notice under Section 148, dated 29.03.2024 (Annexure P-2), as assailed in this petition. We direct that the present petition shall be governed by the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the decision thereto, shall be binding on this case also.

4. The continuity of proceedings before the competent authority, in view of the pendency of the

3. ( 2025:HHC:19881 ) matter before the Hon’ble Supreme Court is bound to lead multiplicity of litigation. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to stay such proceedings till the time issue is finally decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Ordered accordingly.

5. The petition is disposed of in above terms, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 25th June, 2025 (mamta)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead