Himachal Pradesh High Court
RSA/80/2013 of HAPPY GARG Vs MS SANJEEV ENTERPRISES on 19 September 2026
alias Ambrish Garg vs. M/s Sanjeev Enterprises RSA No.80 of 2013. 19.09.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate, vice counsel, for the respondent. It is contended by learned vice counsel for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Happy Garg alias Ambrish Garg vs. M/s Sanjeev Enterprises
RSA No.80 of 2013.
19.09.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate, vice counsel, for the respondent.
It is contended by learned vice counsel for the respondent that the sole proprietor of the respondent, Shri Ravi Bhatia, has expired during the pendency of the appeal. Her said statement is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks three weeks’ time to take consequential steps for bringing on record the legal representatives of the sole respondent.
List after three weeks.
( Romesh Verma )
Judge
19th September, 2026 (krt)