Himachal Pradesh High Court

CARBC/39/2026 of SANJUL AGGARWAL Vs STATE on 19 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CARBC No. 39 of 2026 Decided on: 19.09.2026 ________________________________________________________ Sanjul Aggarwal ……... Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. …Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CARBC No. 39 of 2026 Decided on: 19.09.2026 ________________________________________________________ Sanjul Aggarwal

……... Petitioner

Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.

…Respondents ________________________________________________________

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Swati Verma, Advocate.

For the respondents: Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Deputy Advocate General. ________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that objections in the case at hand have been wrongly filed before this court, rather in terms of notification dated 17.10.2022, whereby pecuniary jurisdiction of learned District Judge has been enhanced to the tune of Rs.1.00 crore, case at hand is required to be filed before the learned District Judge.

2. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Registry to retain photocopies of the objections along with other documents and return the originals to the petitioner, enabling it to present the same before the appropriate court of law. Needless to say, court concerned while dealing with the objections, if any, of limitation shall take note of the fact that at the first instance, petitioner had wrongly approached this Court.

(Sandeep Sharma) Judge September 19, 2026 Sunil

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead