Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMPMO/204/2026 of PRIYANKA CHAUHAN Vs AKSHAY THAKUR on 18 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.204 of 2026 Date of decision:18.09.2026 Priyanka Chauhan ...Petitioner Versus Akshay Thakur ...Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No.204 of 2026
Date of decision:18.09.2026
Priyanka Chauhan
...Petitioner
Versus
Akshay Thakur
...Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
It is heartening to note that, with the intervention of learned Mediator, Ms. Ritta Goswami, learned Senior Advocate, the parties have amicably settled the dispute inter se them. The parties have entered into a compromise deed which is part of the record and which has been duly signed by the respective parties.
2. In view of the settlement arrived at and the terms and conditions finalised between the parties, this petition is ordered to be disposed of with the direction that both the parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the compromise, which was effected by Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
them, and which has been duly signed and acknowledged by both of them.
3. With these observations, the present petition is ordered to be closed. Let the compromise deed be made part and parcel of the present order and the parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the same, failing which the erring party shall be liable to be punished under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 18th September, 2026.
(vt)