Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1362/2026 of DEVI SINGH Vs ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS on 18 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 1362/2026 Decided on: 18.09.2026 Devi Singh …..Petitioner Versus Dr. Abhishek Jain & ors. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:40086 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 1362/2026
Decided on: 18.09.2026
Devi Singh
…..Petitioner
Versus
Dr. Abhishek Jain & ors. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Prashant Manhans, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
The present petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of order, dated 01.01.2026, as passed by this Court in CWP No. 20857/2025.
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of office order, dated 22.05.2026, whereby case of the petitioner has been considered and accepted, relevant portion whereof reads as under:- “As order passed by the Hon'ble High Court and as per approval received from the Govt., vide their letter dated 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
01.11.2025 and 04.04.2026, the petitioners are allowed higher pay scale in the concerned level of pay matrix after completion of two years regular service subject to the final outcome of LPA filed by the State in Mohit Sharma case. The DDO concerned is hereby directed to fix the pay of the petitioner and release the arrear as per Finance Department instruction from time to time and compliance report sent to this Directorate immediately. However, an undertaking to this effect may be obtained from the petitioner that the overpayment if any, found, in later stage shall be recovered from them accordingly. The entry be also made in the service book of individual concerned. May inform the parties accordingly.”
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has acknowledged the aforesaid fact.
4. Since the order in question stands fully complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is closed. The petition stands disposed of.
(Romesh Verma) 18.09.2026
Judge (pankaj)