Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2040/2026 of SURINDER KUMAR Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 18 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2040 of 2026 Date of Decision: 18.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Surinder Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.2040 of 2026 Date of Decision: 18.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Surinder Kumar
…….Petitioner
Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
… Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar Manget & Mr. Rajendera Gulati, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that since petitioner failed to submit representation in terms of judgment dated 27.03.2024 passed by this Court in CWP No. 2336 of 2024, titled Surinder Kumar versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others, needful, in terms of directions contained in aforesaid judgment, could not be done. He states that as and when such representation is filed, same shall be decided expeditiously.
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. In view of the above, petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file fresh representation within a period of one week in terms of judgment dated 27.03.2024 passed in CWP No. 2336 of 2024, which shall be decided by the competent authority expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 18, 2026 (sunil)