Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18436/2025 of S.K. SHARMA CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS on 17 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18436 of 2025 Date of Decision: 17.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ S.K. Sharma Contractors and Engineers ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.18436 of 2025
Date of Decision: 17.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ S.K. Sharma Contractors and Engineers ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vipul Sharda, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the State. __________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record communication dated 14.09.2026 issued under the signature of Superintendent Engineer, Jal Shakti Circle, Nurpur, which is taken on record, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General states that final running bill No.12 amounting to Rs. 76,22,598/- was verified. He states that finalization of the amount could not be made and some more time is required for doing the same. He states that out of the verified amount, sum of Rs. 54,02,792/- stands paid to the petitioner and the remaining amount shall be paid expeditiously after due verification.
2
2. Having taken note of the fact that petitioner has been paid a substantial amount coupled with the fact that respondents are ready and willing to release the remaining amount within a reasonable time, this Court sees no reason to keep the present matter alive and as such, present petition is disposed of accordingly, with a direction to the respondents to ensure that the remaining amount, after due verification, is paid to the petitioner within a period of two months, failing which petitioner shall be entitled to approach this Court again. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of
September 17, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge