Himachal Pradesh High Court
OMPM/453/2026 of VIDYA SAGAR Vs LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, NHAI AND ORS on 16 September 2026
LAO, NHAI & others OMP(M) No.453 of 2026 16.09.2026 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the applicant. Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G., for respondent No.3. OMP(M) No.453 of 2026 This application has been filed for condonation
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Vidya Sagar vs. LAO, NHAI & others
OMP(M) No.453 of 2026
16.09.2026 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the applicant. Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G., for respondent No.3. OMP(M) No.453 of 2026
This application has been filed for condonation of 29 days' delay in filing the present appeal. A perusal of the application reveals that the judgment was passed by the learned District Judge on 02.09.2025. The certified copy of the judgment was applied on 14.11.2025 and the same was supplied on 17.11.2025. After receiving the certified copy, the applicant consulted the counsel who advised him to file an appeal in this Court. Earlier, the applicant was being represented by Shri Mohinder Thakur and Shri Lal Singh, Advocates, before the learned court below. Thereafter, the copies of the orders were intermingled in the office file and could not be traced till 27.12.2025. Immediately thereafter, action was taken for the filing of the instant appeal. The delay in filing the same is neither intentional nor deliberate, but the same has occurred on account of unavoidable circumstances.
Learned counsel for the non-applicants has no objection in case the application is allowed in favour of the applicant.
Consequently, in view of the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the application is allowed
Arb. Appeal No.______ of 2026
Be registered.
List along with Arb. Appeal No.407 of 2026 on 24.09.2026..
( Romesh Verma )
Judge September 16, 2026
(vt)