Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2065/2026 of RITIKA DEVI Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 16 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2065 of 2026 Date of Decision: 16.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Ritika Devi and Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.2065 of 2026
Date of Decision: 16.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Ritika Devi and Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioners: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel representing the petitioners fairly states that though mandate contained in judgment sought to be executed has been complied with, but till date, consequential benefits/arrears have not been released.
2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, having perused order passed in purported compliance of mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed, states that consequential benefits, if not
2 already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months.
3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present proceedings and present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to ensure that consequential benefits flowing from the compliance, if not already released, shall be released within a period of two months, failing which petitioners would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment.
September 16, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge