Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.PT/13/2025 of AJAY KUMAR THAKUR AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER on 16 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.13 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Ajay Kumar Thakur & Ors. …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.13 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Ajay Kumar Thakur & Ors.
…….Petitioners
Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.
… Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ridima Karol, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record order dated 23.07.2026 passed by Division Bench of this Court in CMP(M) No.1175 of 2026, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners states that judgment sought to be executed has been stayed and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings.
Having carefully perused aforesaid order vis-à-vis judgment sought to be executed, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and as such,
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file afresh at appropriate stage.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 16, 2026 (sunil)