Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/17368/2025 of AJAY SAUHTA Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 16 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.17368 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Ajay Sautha ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.17368 of 2025
Date of Decision: 16.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Ajay Sautha ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rishi Tandon, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. __________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record communication dated 14.09.2026 issued under the signature of Under Secretary (Industries) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that Department of Industries vide letter dated 14.09.2026, copy whereof has been attached with aforesaid communication, has conveyed approval for issuance of letter of intent in favour of the petitioner and others.
2
2. Having carefully perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, there appears to be merit in the contention of the learned Deputy Advocate General.
3. Consequently, in view of the aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in instant proceedings and present petition is disposed of with direction to the Director (Industries) to ensure that letter of intent in terms of approval granted in favour of the petitioner and others is issued, if not already issued, expeditiously, preferably within a period of ten days. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
September 16, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge