Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.PT/80/2026 of JAGDISH KUMAR Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 16 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 80 of 2026 Date of Decision: 16.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Jagdish Kumar …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:39596 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 80 of 2026 Date of Decision: 16.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Jagdish Kumar
…….Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 15.09.2026, issued under the signatures of Director School Education, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith sanction letter with respect to budge allocation, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that Government has approved due and admissible Grant-in-Aid amounting to Rs. 14, 58, 410/- to the concerned DDO with a direction to disburse the same to the petitioner immediately.
2. Having carefully perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds merit in the statement made by learned Additional Advocate General and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present proceedings and accordingly, same are 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:39596 closed, with a direction to respondent No. 4, i.e., Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Sangna Satahan, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh to ensure that approved Grant-in-aid, as detailed hereinabove, is disbursed/ credited into the bank account of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of 10 days, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived, so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the attachment of the property of the department as well as salary of the erring official.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 16,2026 (shankar)