Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/15959/2026 of SANDEEP VERMA Vs THE UOI AND OTHERS on 15 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15959 of 2026 Date of Decision: 15.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Verma ……...Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.15959 of 2026
Date of Decision: 15.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Verma ……...Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Ms. Chetna Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Narender Thakur, Central Government Counsel, for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the State. __________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for following main reliefs: "a) Issue a writ of Certiorari or Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the impugned office letter dated 24.03.2026 issued by the Respondent No. 3;
b) Direct the Respondents to renew the Petitioner’s passport forthwith without insisting on unnecessary conditions which are not warranted in law."
2
2. Before reply, if any, could be sought from the respondents, learned counsel representing the petitioner made available copy of judgment dated 25.6.2025 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 9259 of 2025, titled Vikramjeet Singh v. State of H.P. and others, to state that case of the petitioner is fully covered by aforesaid judgment.
3. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, after having gone through the afore judgment, fairly admits that same is applicable to the case of the petitioner.
4. Since parties are ad idem that mandate contained in the judgment passed in Vikramjeet Singh (supra) is applicable to the facts of present petition, this Court sees no reason to keep the petition alive and accordingly same is disposed of, making directions passed in Vikramjeet Singh (supra) mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes. All pending applications stand disposed of.
September 15, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge