Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./433/2026 of M/S NDN CONSTRUCTIONS Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 433 of 2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ M/s NDN Constructions …….Petitioner Versus Principal Secretary (Public Works) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh & others
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 433 of 2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ M/s NDN Constructions
…….Petitioner
Versus
Principal Secretary (Public Works) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh & others
… Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Vivek Negi, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 10.09.2026, issued under signature of Executive Engineer, Sundernagar Division, HPPWD Sundernagar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that all the pending bills of the petitioner stand cleared and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition.
2. Having carefully perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds that payment against 1st to 8th running bills has been made to petitioner-contractor to the tune of Rs. 6,58,54,901/- and now nothing stands due to be paid to petitioner.
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
3. In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly same is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 11,2026 (shankar)