Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/4270/2019 of M/S J.B. ROLLING MILLS LTD Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4270 of 2019 Decided on: 10.09.2026 M/s J.B. Rolling Mills Limited & others … Petitioners Versus Union of India and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:38487 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.4270 of 2019 Decided on: 10.09.2026 M/s J.B. Rolling Mills Limited & others … Petitioners Versus Union of India and others … Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioners: M/s Ajay Vaidya, and Surinder Saklani, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, CGC, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vijay Kumar Arora, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 4. Mr. Sushant Kaprate, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) In the course of going through this petition, we find that a joint petition has been filed on behalf of three Companies through one Shri L.C. Kaushal, Authorised Signatory.
2. According to us, this petition in the present form is not maintainable. The three petitioners before us are Companies, duly registered under the Companies Act and each of the petitioners is a juristic person. Such juristic person can approach the Court through an Authorized Signatory who stands so authorised to propagate the cause of such Company by a Resolution duly passed by the Board of Directors of that particular Company. This is lacking in the present petition.
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2026:HHC:38487
3. Faced with this situation, learned Counsel for the petitioners prays that the petitioners be allowed to withdraw the petition, with liberty to approach the Court again on the issue raised therein independently. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge (Yogesh Jaswal) Judge
September 10, 2026 (Rishi)