Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1192/2026 of KARAN VIMAL AND ANOTHER Vs ASHISH KOHLI on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1192 of 2026 Date of decision:10.09.2026 Karan Vimal & another ...Petitioners Versus Ashish Kohli ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.1192 of 2026
Date of decision:10.09.2026
Karan Vimal & another
...Petitioners
Versus Ashish Kohli
...Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
The instant petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment passed in CWP No. 7866 of 2026 dated 29.05.2026. This Court had issued notice to the respondent on 25.08.2026.
2. Today, the learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record the copy of the office order dated 10.09.2026, whereby, after considering the case of the petitioners, the same has been allowed. The DDO concerned has been directed to fix the pay of the petitioners and release the arrears as per the instructions of the Finance Department issued from time to time, subject to the condition that in case the decision of the LPA goes against the present petitioners, they Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
-2-
shall be bound to refund the amount of arrears so paid to them. An undertaking in this respect has been ordered to be obtained from the petitioners, stating that if any overpayment is found at a later stage, the same shall be recovered from them accordingly.
3. Since the judgment stands fully complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition. Consequently, the same is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any. Notice discharged.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 10th September, 2026
(vt)