Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/8934/2023 of URGYAN DORJE AND OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS on 9 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8934 of 2023 Date of Decision: 9.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Urgyan Dorge and Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus Union of India and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.8934 of 2023
Date of Decision: 9.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Urgyan Dorge and Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus Union of India and Ors. …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Central Government Counsel, for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the State. __________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
On 24.6.2026, this Court, after having taken note of statement made by Shri Akshay Dubey, Executive Engineer (Civil), Commanding Officer, 68 RCC, passed following order: “Sh. Akshay Dubey, Executive Engineer (C), Commanding Officer, 68 RCC has attended the hearing and placed on record office instructions dated 22.06.2026. He submits that the case of the petitioners has been recommended for acquisition of the land parcels, which fall under Category-I (Annexure-A appended alongwith office instructions dated 23.09.2025 furnished from the office of the Deputy Commissioner, District Kinnaur at Reckong Peo) and the matter is under process with the higher/ competent authorities. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to have instructions as to which of the land parcels mentioned in aforesaid Annexure-A belong to the petitioners. At this request, list this matter on 16.07.2026.”
2. Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, on the instructions of the petitioners, fairly states that petitioners would be content and satisfied in case land parcels as detailed in Annexure-A (available at page 98 of the paper book), are acquired by respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and they are paid adequate compensation in accordance with law.
3. Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, learned Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3, states that case of the petitioners has been already recommended for acquisition of the land parcels, which fall under Category-I and necessary steps for acquisition of the same shall be taken expeditiously.
4. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to acquire the land as has been recommended by respondent Nos. 1 to 3 (Annexure-A, available at page 98 of the paper book), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months and thereafter, adequate compensation in accordance
with law be paid to the petitioners. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
September 9, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge