Himachal Pradesh High Court
Cr.Rev.(FC)/54/2025 of MANJIT KAUR Vs Kiran Pal Singh on 9 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.R.(FC) No. 54 of 2025 Date of decision: 09.09.2026 Manjit Kaur and another …..Petitioners Versus Kiran Pal Singh …..Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:38359
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.R.(FC) No. 54 of 2025 Date of decision: 09.09.2026 Manjit Kaur and another …..Petitioners
Versus Kiran Pal Singh …..Respondent
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. H.S. Rana, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this Criminal Revision, the petitioner has approached this Court, seeking the following relief:- “The present appeal may very kindly be allowed and the impugned judgment dated 05.05.2025 passed by the learned Family Court in Case No.623/2020 may very kindly be modified and enhance the monthly maintenance allowance awarded to petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 to 40,000/- ₹40,000/- being just and reasonable amount, commensurate with the respondent’s income and the petitioners needs justice be done.”
2. During the course of hearing of this petition, the matter was referred for mediation. Report from the learned Mediator has been received, in terms whereof, the matter has been amicably 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
2026:HHC:38359 settled between the parties in terms of compromise which stands appended with the report of learned Mediator.
3. Accordingly, as prayed for, these proceedings are closed by modifying the order under challenge by observing that now the issue between the parties shall be construed to have been settled in terms of settlement which was arrived at between the parties before learned Mediator. The terms of settlement shall form part of the record and the same shall be read as part of this order also. It goes without saying that both the parties shall abide by the terms of the mutual agreement entered into between them, in letter and spirit.
4. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge (Yogesh Jaswal) Judge
09th September, 2026. (yogesh)