Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMP.M/1094/2026 of AMAR NATH AND ANOTHER Vs NAND LAL AND OTHERS on 9 September 2026
vs. Nand Lal CMP (M) No. 1094/2026 09.09.2026 Present: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for the appellants/applicants. Mr. Hitesh Bali, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 5. CMP (M) No. 1094/2026 In sequel to order, dated 14.07.2026, though respondent No.6 has been duly served, but none has appeared
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Amar Nath vs. Nand Lal
CMP (M) No. 1094/2026
09.09.2026 Present: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for the
appellants/applicants.
Mr. Hitesh Bali, Advocate, for respondents No. 1
to 5.
CMP (M) No. 1094/2026
In sequel to order, dated 14.07.2026, though respondent No.6 has been duly served, but none has appeared on his behalf. Therefore, respondent No.6 is proceeded ex-parte.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, coupled with no objection, as pleaded by learned counsel for respondents No. 1 to 5 for the instant application being allowed, delay of one day in filing the appeal is condoned. The appeal be registered. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No. 2026
Send for the records. List for admission after two weeks. Learned counsel for the appellants undertakes to supply a copy of entire paper book to learned counsel for respondents No. 1 to 5 during the course of the day.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 09.09.2026 (pankaj