Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMP/3700/2026 of SARDEEP THAKUR Vs Navdeep on 9 September 2026
THAKUR Versus NAVDEEP CRMP-3700 of 2026 in CR.R - 332 of 2025 09.09.2026 Present: Mr. Parveen Kumar Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for the non-applicant/ respondent. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and further three
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SARDEEP THAKUR Versus NAVDEEP
CRMP-3700 of 2026 in CR.R - 332 of 2025
09.09.2026 Present: Mr. Parveen Kumar Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for the non-applicant/ respondent.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and further three days’ time, as prayed for, is granted to the applicant-petitioner to deposit compounding fee to the tune of Rs.5,000/- with HP State Legal Services Authority in terms of judgment dated 29.04.2026 passed by this court in Criminal Revision No. 332 of 2025. In case needful is not done within extended time, petitioner shall render himself liable for penal consequences as well as contempt of Court.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge
September 09, 2026
(Sunil)