Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.PT/206/2025 of ANIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS on 9 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.206 of 2025 Date of Decision: 09.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Anil Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.206 of 2025 Date of Decision: 09.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Anil Kumar
…….Petitioner
Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
… Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 08.09.2026, issued under the signatures of Director Higher Education enclosing therewith copy of corrigendum dated 22.08.2026, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with.
2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, vis-à-vis mandate contained in the judgment sought
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
to be executed, this Court finds that decision has been taken to implement the judgment sought to be executed and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the aforesaid compliance, if not released, shall be released within a period of two months, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 09, 2026 (sunil)