Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/3883/2024 of RAM SAWROOP SHARMA Vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 8 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.3883 of 2024 Date of decision: 08.09.2026 Ram Sawroop Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …..Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.3883 of 2024 Date of decision: 08.09.2026 Ram Sawroop Sharma …..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and others …..Respondents
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta and Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramakant Sharma and Mr.Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocates General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-
(i) . That the respondent- State may be asked to frame pension scheme/ policy and the scheme/ policy for other retiral benefits qua the petitioner and other Home Guards and he may be ordered to be paid pension and other retiral benefits such as gratuity, ex- gratia and group insurance etc. from the date the petitioner has been retired from service.
(ii) . That the Home Guards rules may be struck down to the extent for not making any provisions for pension and other retiral benefits qua the petitioner and other Home Guards.” 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
2. In the light of the judgment pronounced by us today in CWP No.6654 of 2023, this petition is also not maintainable, as the issue raised in the present writ petition is also same and similar to the one which was raised in the Original Application, reference of which has been given by us in detail in Civil Writ Petition i.e. CWP No.6654 of 2023.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is also dismissed with the observation that the reasoning given by us in CWP No.6654 of 2023 shall be construed to have been returned in the present petition also. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge (Yogesh Jaswal) Judge
08th September, 2026. (yogesh)