Himachal Pradesh High Court

EX.P./1875/2026 of BALA DUTTA Vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS on 7 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1875 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Bala Dutta …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

2026:HHC:37831 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Execution Petition No. 1875 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Bala Dutta

…….Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1

For the Petitioners: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):

Petitioner seeks execution of directions contained in CWP No.11933/2024, titled as Bala Dutta Versus State of H.P. & Ors., decided on 07.11.2024.

2. It is an admitted position that the “Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024” has been quashed and set aside in CWP No.3361 of 2025, titled as Devinder Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr., decided along with connected matters on 25.04.2026. It is also a matter of record that Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24885/2026, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Devinder Kumar & Ors., instituted by the State of Himachal Pradesh against the aforementioned judgment, has been dismissed by the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2 2026:HHC:37831 Hon’ble Apex Court on 29.07.2026. While dismissing the appeal, the Hon’ble Apex Court granted four months’ time to the State Government to do the needful in terms of the judgment.

3. Consequently, in view of above, the present proceedings are closed, at this stage, with direction to the respondents to pass consideration order, in accordance with the timeline indicated by the Hon’ble Apex Court. The petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of her surviving grievances, if any, at an appropriate stage, in case necessity so arises in future. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sandeep Sharma),

Judge September 07,2026 (shankar)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead