Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1981/2026 of PURAN DASS Vs THE HRTC AND ANOTHER on 7 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1981 of 2026 Date of Decision: 7.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Puran Chand ……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors. …....Respondents Coram
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.1981 of 2026
Date of Decision: 7.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Puran Chand ……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr.Rahul Gathania, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 23.12.2025, passed by coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 20330 of 2025, titled Puran Chand v Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Anr., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to respondent/competent authority to pay all remaining retiral benefits with actual rate of interest as per applicable rules, till the time of actual payment within a period of six months. Since no action, whatsoever, came
2 to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings.
2. Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, appearing for the respondents, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of three weeks from today.
3. Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by the learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment alleged to have been violated within a period of three weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment.
September 7, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge