Himachal Pradesh High Court
CARBC/17/2026 of M/S HARTEK SOLAR PRIVATE LIMITED Vs SJVN GREEN ENERGY LIMITED AND ANOTHER on 3 September 2026
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CARBC No. 17 of 2026-D Decided on: 03.09.2026 ________________________________________________________ 1. CARBC-17 of 2026 Hartek Solar Pvt. Ltd. ……... Petitioner Versus SJVN Green Energy Ltd. …Respondents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CARBC No. 17 of 2026-D
Decided on: 03.09.2026
________________________________________________________
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CARBC-17 of 2026 Hartek Solar Pvt. Ltd.
……... Petitioner
Versus SJVN Green Energy Ltd.
…Respondents _______________________________________________________
2. CARBC-64 of 2026 SJVN Green Energy Ltd.
……... Petitioner
Versus Hartek Solar Pvt. Ltd.
…Respondents ________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ________________________________________________________
For the petitioner(s): Mr. Arjun Lall & Ms. Tamanns Basoli, Advocates, for the petitioner, in CARBC- 17 of 2026 and respondent No.1 in CARBC-64 of 2026
For the respondent(s): Mr. Utkarsh Singh & Ms. Ritika Singh, Advocates (through Video Conferencing), Ms. Astha Kohli and Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Advocates along with Mr. Ravi Jamwal, Deputy Manager SJVN (through video conferencing), for respondent No.1 in CARBC-17 of 2026 and petitioner in CARBC-64 of 2026.
Mr. Digvijay Singh & Ms. Anita, Advocates, for respondent No.2 in CARBC-64 of 2026. ________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (oral)
Learned counsel for the parties fairly state that on account of subsequent developments, whereby proceedings have commenced before the Dispute Adjudication Board, the present petitions have been rendered infructuous and accordingly, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, interim order dated 09.04.2026
- 2 - passed in CARBC-17 of 2022 shall remain in force till the matter is referred to the learned Abritrator, if required.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge September 03, 2026 Sunil