Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1209/2026 of NEHA VERMA Vs RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS on 1 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1209 of 2026 Decided on : 01.09.2026 Neha Verma ...Petitioner. Versus Rakesh Kanwar & others ...Respondents. Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 1209 of 2026
Decided on : 01.09.2026 Neha Verma
...Petitioner. Versus Rakesh Kanwar & others ...Respondents.
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge(oral) The instant petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWP No. 6772 of 2026, titled Neha Verma vs. State of H.P., dated 23.05.2025.
2. When the case was listed on 31.08.2026, learned Additional Advocate General had sought time to have the latest instructions in the matter.
3. Today, he has placed on record the Office Order dated 31.08.2026, whereby the case of the present petitioner has been considered and the concerned authorities have been directed to grant higher pay scale after completion of two years of regular service in favour of the petitioner and re-fix her pay and release all the consequential arrears, subject to final outcome of the legal remedy, if any, in Mohit Sharma's case.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the present petition can be closed, however, liberty may be granted to him to revive the present petition, in case the grievance, as raised by the present petitioner, still remains unaddressed. Liberty granted.
5. Consequently, the present petition is closed with liberty as prayed for. Notices are discharged. (Romesh Verma)
Judge September 1, 2026 (Nisha)