Himachal Pradesh High Court

OMPM/193/2026 of NHAI Vs RATTAN LAL on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Lal OMP(M) No. 193 of 2026 25.08.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant. The present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 439 days in filing the present appeal. It has been averred that the impugned order was passed by learned District Judge, Bilaspur

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

NHAI vs. Rattan Lal

OMP(M) No. 193 of 2026

25.08.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant.

The present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 439 days in filing the present appeal. It has been averred that the impugned order was passed by learned District Judge, Bilaspur on 21.11.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant had applied for certified copy of impugned order on 06.03.2025 and the same was delivered on 05.04.2025. However, the disposal of the case was not within the knowledge of the applicant as the same was never intimated to the applicant by its counsel.

As per the applicant, earlier also, due to inefficiency and lackadaisical attitude of the law firm, namely, M/s M.V. Kini & Co, cases were withdrawn from it on 20.09.2023. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the legal opinion was sought for determining the future course of action and the said opinion was received by the Regional Office. Thereafter, the matter was examined at various levels for the purpose of filing the appeal and finally it was decided to challenge the award as passed by the learned District Judge, Bilaspur. Therefore, it has been prayed that the delay in filing the appeal is neither intentional nor willful, but the same has occurred due to unavoidable circumstances.

Consequently, in view of the averments as made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit and in view of submissions as made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.

Arb. Appeal No._______/2026

Appeal be registered.

Heard.

Admit.

Send for records. Issue post admission notice for the service of the respondent, returnable within three weeks, on steps being taken within three days. List for hearing in due course.

OMPST No. 3980 of 2026

Be registered. Heard.

Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount along with up-to-date interest by the appellant/applicant within a period of eight weeks from today, the operation, implementation and execution of impugned order dated 21.11.2024, as passed by learned District Judge, Bilaspur as well as arbitral award dated 14.07.2022, is ordered to be stayed during the pendency of appeal.

Application stands disposed of.

(Romesh Verma)

Judge 25th August, 2026

(kck)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead